Tagged with Football

Tebow Mania and Passer Rating

Now that the college season is over, football fans can concentrate on what really matters: Tebow-mania!  Timmy Terrific has led the Denver Broncos to the AFC Divisional Round of the NFL playoffs.  The Broncos, who started the season 1-4, turned their season around by winning 7 of their last 11 games, many in dramatic fashion, with Mr. Tebow at the helm — good enough to squeak into the playoffs at 8-8 and even earn a home playoff game.  In that game, played Sunday, January 8th, they drew the heavily favored defending AFC champs the Pittsburgh Steelers, who took an early 6-0 lead.  Denver battled back with a big second quarter, but the Steelers made their own charge and ultimately the game went to overtime.  This was the first time a playoff game had gone to overtime since the inception of new NFL overtime rules.  Previously, overtime was sudden death, with the first team to score, either a touchdown or field goal (or safety), winning the game.  Under the new rules, only a touchdown on the first possession will end the game immediately; a field goal allows the other team a chance to possess the ball.  Needless to say, Denver won the coin toss (Pittsburgh called tails) and needed only one play to score a touchdown.  The play was an 80 yard pass over the middle that went the distance.One reason this occurred was because the Steelers had been bringing a lot of defenders close to the line of scrimmage, as they did not believe Tebow could beat them with his passing ability.  It was widely believed among the “experts” that Tebow, who is one of the greatest college football players of all time, and his style of play would not translate to success in the NFL.  Many people still believe this.

I hadn’t really thought much about Tebow one way or the other until one of his stats caught my eye.  In Denver’s week 10 win over the Kansas City Chiefs, Tebow’s passer rating was 102.6 based on 2 completions in 8 attempts, good for 69 yards, 1 touchdown, and no interceptions.  For some context, 102.6 was good enough for 7th best rating among starting quarterbacks that week.  This seemed odd to me since 2 for 8, 69 yards, and 1 touchdown seems like a terrible game.

So this got me wondering: What exactly is passer rating?  This website describes the formula in detail along with some of its history, but the basics are as follows.

1. Compute completions divided by passing attempts, subtract 0.3, and multiply by 5.
2. Compute yards divided by passing attempts, subtract 3, and multiple by 0.25
3. Compute touchdowns divided by passing attempts and multiply by 20.
4. Compute interceptions divided by passing attempts, multiply this by 25, and subtract this from 2.375

If any of the results of the four parts is less than 0 or greater than 2.375, that component is rounded up or down to the respective bound.  Now, add the four, possibly rounded, components together, multiply by 100, and divide by 6.  This yields a maximum score of 158.3.  (I swear I didn’t just make all of that up; the NFL actually uses this.)

Now since I like football and I love R, I decided to do some graphical exploring with passer rating.  Since the only topic anyone wants to talk about in the NFL right now is Tim Tebow, I figured I had to look at him.  And who better to compare him to than his opponent next week, three time Super Bowl champion Patriots quarterback Tom Brady.  Using the data from their regular season games (Tebow started 11 games and came in at half time in week 5; Brady started all 16), I created these graphs for Tom Brady and Tim Tebow.  Each individual graph shows how quarterback rating would vary based on number of completions and total passing yards for a fixed number of passing attempts, touchdowns, and interceptions. The green dot in each plot represents where each quarterback actually fell that week in their game.

What stands out to me in looking at these graphs is Brady’s consistency.  The green Brady dot seems to be always in the right, upper half of the graph.  Week in and week out he puts up around 300 yards (with the occasional 517 yard game thrown in) and a completion percentage in the mid to high 60s.  In fact, Brady had a completion percentage of over 50% in every single game this season.

Tebow, on the other hand, is, to put it politely, all over the place.  In week 13, Tebow put up a nearly perfect passer rating of 149.3, which is almost 14 points higher than Brady’s best passer rating of the season.  On the other hand, Tebow had a lower passer rating than Brady’s worst passer rating, 75.4, in 5 out of the 12 games Tebow started.  So you could say that almost half of the time this season, Tebow was worse than Brady’s worst.

This all adds up to the fact that the Broncos should lose to the Patriots.  Based on the stats, Brady is too good and Tebow is too inconsistent to amount to a Denver victory.  Of course, while you may find all of this interesting, in the end none of these numbers or pretty pictures mean anything at all to Tim Tebow, who, as they say, only cares about one stat and that’s winning.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

NFL Rankings – After Week 17

Rankings updated as of 1/1/2012; Records updated as of  1/1/2012; CHFF rankings as of 12/28/2011

AFC NFC

Playoff team

Division Champ

Eliminated from Playoffs

 Team Rank Change Record CHFF Rank
New England 1 - 13-3 3
Pittsburgh 2 12-4 1
Green Bay 3 15-1 6
Baltimore 4 - 12-4 5
Atlanta 5 - 10-6 11
NY Jets 6 8-8 2
New Orleans 7 13-3 15
Chicago 8 - 8-8 23
Detroit 9 10-6 10
San Francisco 10 - 13-3 4
NY Giants 11 9-7 8
Philadelphia 12 - 8-8 12
San Diego 13 - 8-8 18
Tampa Bay 14 4-12 14
Kansas City 15 7-9 30
Seattle 16 ↑↑↑↑ 7-9 9
Oakland 17 8-8 26
Cincinnati 18 9-7 22
Dallas 19 8-8 7
Tennessee 20 9-7 19
Miami 21 6-10 13
Houston 22 10-6 20
Buffalo 23 - 6-10 24
Indianapolis 24 2-14 16
Denver 25 8-8 30
Washington 26 ↑↑↑↑ 5-11 28
Minnesota 27 3-13 27
Cleveland 28 4-12 21
Arizona 29 8-8 29
Jacksonville 30 5-11 25
Carolina 31 - 6-10 17
StLouis 32 - 2-14 32

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , ,

NFL Rankings Christmas Edition – 12/22/2011

Rankings updated as of 12/22/2011; Records updated as of 6:22pm 12/24/2011

AFC NFC

Clinched Playoff Berth

Divison Leader Division Champ

Eliminated from Playoffs

 Team Rank Change Record CHFF Rank
New England 1 12-3 3
Green Bay 2 13-1 1
Pittsburgh 3 - 11-4 7
Baltimore 4 - 11-4 6
Atlanta 5 - 9-5 8
New Orleans 6 11-3 2
NY Jets 7 8-7 11
Chicago 8 - 7-7 23
San Francisco 9 ↑↑ 11-3 4
NY Giants 10 ↓↓ 8-7 14
Detroit 11 9-5 9
Philadelphia 12 - 6-8 17
San Diego 13 ↑↑ 7-7 13
Tampa Bay 14 4-11 29
Kansas City 15 ↑↑ 6-9 25
Houston 16 ↓↓ 10-5 5
Oakland 17 8-7 16
Seattle 18 ↑↑↑ 7-7 18
Miami 19 5-10 20
Dallas 20 ↑↑ 8-6 10
Cincinnati 21 9-6 12
Tennessee 22 ↓↓↓ 8-7 22
Denver 23 - 8-6 15
Buffalo 24 - 6-9 26
Arizona 25 ↑↑↑↑ 7-8 19
Cleveland 26 4-11 27
Jacksonville 27 4-11 28
Indianapolis 28 - 2-13 32
Washington 29 5-10 24
Minnesota 30 ↓↓↓ 3-12 30
St. Louis 31 - 2-13 31
Carolina 32 - 6-9 21

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , ,

An arbitrary ranking of NCAA college basketball teams – 12/11/2011

Rankings as of noon on 12/11/2011 .

 Team Rank Change Record AP (12/12/11)
Indiana 1 0 9-0 18
Illinois 2 0 10-0 19
Syracuse 3 0 10-0 1
Minnesota 4 0 10-1
Marquette 5 0 9-0 11
Northwestern 6 0 7-1  40
Ohio State 7 0 8-1 2
Missouri 8 0 9-0 10
Duke 9 0 9-1 7
Louisville 10 0 9-0 4
Baylor 11 0 7-0 6
Northern Iowa 12 0 9-1 35
Purdue 13 0 9-2
Michigan State 14 0 8-2 21
Wisconsin 15 0 8-2 14
Pittsburgh 16 0 9-1 15
Seton Hall 17 0 8-1
Kansas 18 0 7-2 12
Xavier 19 0 8-0 8
San Diego State 20 0 9-2 28
Connecticut 21 0 8-1 9
Oklahoma 22 0 7-1
Ole Miss 23 0 8-1
Michigan 24 0 7-2 20
Saint Louis 25 0 9-1 32

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 12/4/2011

Rankings as of 12/04/2011.  Previous weeks rankings here.

The BCS explained:  It used to be that a national champion in college football was determined solely by human polls.  However, human polls are suspect because you are asking each voter to process the results of hundreds of college football games from teams all across the country and form a well thought out, reasoned ranking of the top 25 teams, which is clearly impossible; It’s too much data for a human to handle.  That’s why the BCS introduced the computer rankings which could, without personal bias, crunch the numbers and produce a ranking taking all games into account equally.  The computer rankings, on the average, do a very reasonable job of ranking the teams.   Ultimately, however, the non-human polls, a computational exercise in futility, are simply ignored, as they are overwhelmed by the human polls, and the BCS gets what it wants while it hides behind the computer polls to offer a whiff of legitimacy to the absolute garbage it spews out.

BCS Bowl Team

ACC Big East Big Ten Big 12 Pac 12 SEC Other

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
LSU 1 - 13-0 1
Oklahoma State 2 - 11-1 3
Kansas State 3 ↑↑ 10-2 8
Alabama 4 11-1
Oklahoma 5 ↓↓ 9-3 14 
Baylor 6 9-3 12
Stanford 7 11-1 4
Oregon 8 ↑↑↑ 11-2 5
Arkansas 9 10-2 6
South Carolina 10 10-2 9
USC 11 10-2
Georgia 12 - 10-3 16
Virginia Tech 13 - 11-2 11
Boise State 14 ↑↑↑ 11-1 7
Michigan 15 10-2 13
Wisconsin 16 ↑↑ 11-2 10
Texas 17 ↓↓↓ 7-5 24
Clemson 18 ↑↑↑↑ 10-3 15
Nebraska 19 9-3 20
Houston 20 ↓↓↓↓↓ 12-1 19
Missouri 21 - 7-5
TCU 22 ↑↑↑↑↑ 10-2 18
Michigan State 23 ↓↓↓ 10-3 17
Penn State 24 9-3 22
Texas A&M 25 6-6

And finally, representing the Big East/Big Least: West Virginia

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 11/27/2011

Rankings as of 11/27/2011.  Previous weeks rankings here.

Some people were not thrilled about my rankings last week when I still had Oklahoma State ranked number 1.  For example, one guy critically criticized me by saying: “I’m impressed! You spell very well and your paragraph structure is spot in. That us amazing since it is apparent that you are fucking retarded.”  He will be happy to know that I now have LSU ranked number 1.

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
LSU 1 1 12-0 1
Oklahoma State 2 -1 10-1
Oklahoma 3 1 9-2
Alabama 4 1 11-1
Kansas State 5 -2 9-2
Stanford 6 3 11-1
Baylor 7 0 8-3
Arkansas 8 -2 10-2
South Carolina 9 1 10-2
USC 10 2 10-2
Oregon 11 0 10-2
Georgia 12 2 10-2
Virginia Tech 13 -5 11-1
Texas 14 -1 7-4
Houston 15 0 12-0
Michigan 16 2 10-2
Boise State 17 4 10-1
Nebraska 18 5 9-3
Wisconsin 19 10-2
Michigan State 20 4 10-2
Missouri 21 1 7-5
Clemson 22 -6 9-3
Iowa State 23 -6 6-5
Texas A&M 24 -4 6-6
Penn State 25 -6 9-3

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 11/20/2011

Rankings as of 11/20/2011.  Previous weeks rankings here.

(I’ve made a few small corrections from my original post; I found a mistake in the data.  For instance, Michigan State is now in the top 25 at number 24.)

Ok.  I know.  This isn’t going to look good, but…….I still have Oklahoma State ranked 1 even after their loss to Iowa State.  (A defense of my rankings) They nearly survived the Big 12 gauntlet undefeated, which would have been a most impressive feat.  I’m not sure I can defend this, but since none of the BCS rankings have to defend their methodology then neither should I.

Big movers this week include Baylor, Virginia Tech, and Stanford who are all up 4 spots to 7, 8, and 9, respectively.  The biggest move up this week is Iowa State, who jumps 5 spots to 17.

Clemson falls 8 spots after its loss to North Carolina State and they end up 16. Likewise, Nebraska falls 7 spots to number 23 after losing to Michigan.

Cheers.

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
Oklahoma State 1 0 10-1 4
LSU 2 0 11-0 1
Kansas State 3 1 9-2 11
Oklahoma 4 -1 8-2 9
Alabama 5 0 10-1 2
Arkansas 6 0 10-1 3
Baylor 7 4 7-3 18
Virginia Tech 8 4 10-1 5
Stanford 9 4 10-1 6
South Carolina 10 -1 9-2 12
Oregon 11 -4 9-2 10
USC 12 2 9-2 NR
Texas 13 -3 6-4 25
Georgia 14 1 9-2 13
Houston 15 2 11-0 8
Clemson 16 -8 9-2 17
Iowa State 17 5 6-4 NR
Michigan 18 0 9-2 15
Penn State 19 0 9-2 19
Texas A&M 20 0 6-5 NR
Boise State 21 2 9-1 7
Missouri 22 2 6-5 NR
Nebraska 23 -7 8-3 21
Michigan State 24 1 9-2 14
Auburn 25 -4 7-4 24

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 11/13/2011

Rankings as of 11/13/2011.  Previous weeks rankings here.

No changes at the top.  I’ve still got Oklahoma State number 1, as I have all season.  LSU comes in at number 2 and Oklahoma at number 3.  Texas falls 4 spots after failing to score a touchdown in their loss to Missouri.  Oregon jumps to 7 after it’s victory over previously undefeated Stanford, who falls to 13.

The two biggest movers upward were Nebraska and Michigan.  Nebraska defeated Penn State to climb 8 spots to 16 and Michigan beat a rapidly fading Illinois team to climb 7 spots to 18.

Texas A&M and Auburn both fell 6 spots to 20 and 21, respectively.  Texas A&M lost in 4 OT to Kansas State while Auburn fell to Georgia.  Missouri and Michigan State squeak their way into the top 25 at 24 and 25, respectively, as Texas Tech and Georgia Tech drop out.

By conference, I have 8 Big 12 teams in the top 25 and 6 SEC teams.  The Big 10 has 4 teams, the Pac 12 gets 3, and the ACC has 2.  Mountain West and Conference USA have one team each.

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
Oklahoma State 1 0 10-0 2
LSU 2 0 10-0 1
Oklahoma 3 0 8-1 5
Kansas State 4 1 8-2 13
Alabama 5 -1 9-1 3
Arkansas 6 1 9-1 6
Oregon 7 2 9-1 4
Clemson 8 2 9-1 7
South Carolina 9 2 8-2 12
Texas 10 -4 6-3 23
Baylor 11 2 6-3 22
Virginia Tech 12 0 9-1 8
Stanford 13 -5 9-1 9
USC 14 4 8-2 NR
Georgia 15 2 8-2 14
Nebraska 16 8 8-2 16
Houston 17 2 10-0 11
Michigan 18 7 8-2 18
Penn State 19 -3 8-2 21
Texas A&M 20 -6 6-3 NR
Auburn 21 -6 6-4 24
Iowa State 22 -1 5-4 NR
Boise State 23 -3 8-1 10
Missouri 24 2 5-5 NR
Michigan State 25 3 8-2 15

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 11/6/2011

Rankings as of 11/6/2011.  Previous weeks rankings are here.

What a game last night between LSU and Alabama!  #FieldGoalsAreAwesome

I’ll update the BCS ranks when the new ones come out.

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
Oklahoma State 1 0 9-0
LSU 2 1 9-0
Oklahoma 3 2 8-1
Alabama 4 0 8-1
Kansas St. 5 -3 7-2
Texas 6 6 6-2
Arkansas 7 3 8-1
Stanford 8 0 9-0
Oregon 9 4 8-1
Clemson 10 -4 8-1
South Carolina 11 -2 7-2
Virginia Tech 12 2 8-1
Baylor 13 3 5-3
Texas A&M 14 -7 5-4
Auburn 15 4 6-3
Penn State 16 1 8-1
Georgia 17 7 7-2
USC 18 -3 7-2
Houston 19 6 9-0
Boise State 20 1 8-0
Iowa State 21 11 5-4
Georgia Tech 22 0 7-2
Texas Tech 23 -12 5-4
Nebraska 24 -6 7-2
Michigan 25 -5 7-2

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 11/1/2011

Rankings as of 11/1/2011.  The previous week’s rankings are here.

I apologize for not getting these rankings out until today (Tuesday), but we’re likely without power until Friday or Saturday.  I’m currently in the Western New England College University Law School library, which has power and heat.  Anyway……

There are 5 teams in the SITW top 25 that are not in the BCS top 25 (SITW Ranking):  Texas A&M (15), Texas Tech (18), USC (19), Baylor (21), Missouri (25).

Likewise, the five teams in the BCS top 25 that are not in the SITW top 25 are: Arizona State (26), Wisconsin (30), Michigan State (31), West Virginia (32), and Southern Miss (39).

Based on the disparity between the SITW rankings and the BCS rankings, the most over-rated top 25 BCS team is Boise State, followed by Michigan State and Southern Miss.  The most under-rated team is Texas, followed by Kansas State, Auburn, Oklahoma, and Clemson.

 Team Rank Change Record BCS Rank
Oklahoma State 1 0 8-0 3
Oklahoma 2 3 7-1 8
LSU 3 0 8-0 1
Alabama 4 0 8-0 2
Kansas State 5 -3 7-1 9
Stanford 6 2 8-0 5
Clemson 7 -1 8-1 16
South Carolina 8 1 7-1 6
Arkansas 9 1 7-1 13
Virginia Tech 10 4 8-1 10
Texas 11 1 5-2 20
Oregon 12 1 7-1 24
Nebraska 13 5 7-1 7
Penn State 14 3 8-1 12
Texas A&M 15 -8 5-3 NR
Michigan 16 4 7-1 NR
Auburn 17 2 6-3 19
Texas Tech 18 -7 5-3 14
USC 19 -4 6-2 23
Georgia Tech 20 2 7-2 18
Baylor 21 -5 4-3 4
Boise State 22 -1 7-0 NR
Georgia 23 1 6-2 15
Houston 24 1 8-0 22
Missouri 25 5 4-4 17

BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.

Cheers.

Tagged , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 519 other followers